Atlanta mom Mallerie Shirley loves seeing her son get himself around their kid-friendly neighborhood. So on Election Day last year, with the schools closed, of course she let him ride his scooter to the playground.

But as he scooted along the bike trail just outside his house, a lady approached and started asking him questions, including where his parents were.

The boy, who's 6, did not give the lady his name, age or where he lived. Slightly freaked out, he rode away. But the woman followed him home and must have written down the address, because two days later, a caseworker from the Division of Family & Children Services showed up at Shirley's door.

Shirley wasn't home, but her husband was. The caseworker told him their son had been seen unsupervised. She was going to go interview him and would be back.

At his school, the caseworker asked the boy if his parents loved him and if they did drugs. All because he'd taken a scooter ride to the playground!

On her return visit, the caseworker said the boy was too young to be outside on his own. Shirley and her husband cited the Reasonable Childhood Independence law that had recently been passed in Georgia, with the help of Let Grow (the nonprofit I helm). It gives parents the right to give their kids some unsupervised time, so long as they aren't putting the child in obvious and serious danger.

The caseworker replied that the boy could have broken his leg or been kidnapped. "Her coming up with these worst-case scenarios made us realize: Oh. She's not going to work with us," said Shirley.

A few weeks later, a letter arrived saying Shirley had a "substantiated" finding of neglect against her, "based on the preponderance of evidence."

Calls to the DFCS caseworker were not returned.

Shirley holds a master's in social work. She herself was a caseworker for four years before becoming a software engineer. She knows that the preponderance of evidence is actually on her side: She knows her neighborhood and her son's maturity level. He's a good student, loves school, cleans his room. He also knows his neighbors by name. "We sometimes call him Doogie Howser," says Shirley.

So her Election Day decision was deliberate and considered. What's more, she was letting her son do something that 6-year-olds have done for eons: Ride around the neighborhood.

David DeLugas, head of ParentsUSA, a nonprofit that provides pro bono legal help to parents in situations like this, has taken Shirley's case. He has filed a request for an administrative review to contest Shirley's substantiation of neglect. A donation page has been established to help ParentsUSA cover her legal expenses, as well as those of other parents facing similar difficulties.

In the meantime, Shirley and her husband are living with the DFCS "safety plan" they felt they had to sign, which says "both parents will ensure that both children are supervised at all time."

"It's another instance of the government using language that is so loose that it is impossible to comply with," said DeLugas. Are the kids allowed to be in the front yard, or on a playdate, if Shirley or her husband are not right there ensuring they are constantly supervised? The plan doesn't even say when it will expire.

The caseworker originally told the parents that she felt children shouldn't be going to the playground alone till age 13 (an age at which kids in my generation were already babysitting).

Now, obviously, DFCS has an important job to do: Save children who are truly being neglected and abused. When she was a caseworker, Shirley said, she saw "unthinkable things."

A kid riding his scooter on a day off school was not one of them.

Lenore Skenazy is president of Let Grow, a contributing writer at Reason.com, and author of "Has the World Gone Skenazy?" To learn more about Lenore Skenazy (Lskenazy@yahoo.com) and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate webpage at www.creators.com.

Photo credit: Kelly Sikkema at Unsplash